01/09/2002 15:57 |
|
| | | Post: 814 | Registrato il: 08/01/2002 | Città: TERNI | Età: 44 | Sesso: Maschile | HIStory Fan | | OFFLINE |
|
News reports from around the world recently have stated that when, on Thursday, Britney Spears introduced Michael on stage calling him the "artist of the millennium", she didn't mean he was actually winning that award.
In early reports from MTV, they stated that Michael indeed won the Artist of the Millennium award, and on highlights shows actually captioned him as the winner of the award. Also, Sugar Rose, an "insider" as people "in the know" are called said that he could be receiving an award. But all of these MTV reports have now been corrected, saying he was presented with a birthday cake - and not the award, making Michael look like a fool.
If this was not an award, why was there an a shiny treble clef with a bow around it looking like an award statue, separate from the cake, and in front of where Michael would be speaking? Why did Michael have an award speech ready? And why did MTV claim it was an award for so long, before suddenly changing their mind? Michael is intelligent, and certainly wouldn't have fallen for a trick like this seems to be. Why make Michael come on just for a cake? It seems rather stupid. What would he say?
In this site's opinion, Michael DID win the Artist of the Millennium award - and it looks as though there has been a fix up to make Michael look the fool. No further reports will be posted on this matter unless there is actually something constructive in them which doesn't say "Wacko Jacko makes a boob and embarasses himself".
|