da foxnews..la madre di gavin parla del video girato a febbraio 2003?

Aiuto traduzione!!!!

Jacko Accuser's Mom Signed Video Releases
Thursday, September 23, 2004
By Roger Friedman


Jacko Accuser's Mom Signed Video Releases

The mother of the 12-year-old boy who has accused Michael Jackson of child molestation has claimed that she was forced to participate in a video extolling the singer’s virtues. The video was made on Feb. 19, 2003, and sold to FOX as a rebuttal to the Martin Bashir interview that aired on ABC 10 days earlier.

But wait: It turns out that far from being forced to do anything, the mother and all three of her children signed releases agreeing to participate in the video project. And, according to my sources, not only did they sign the releases, but the mother re-wrote the standard boilerplate wording she received from Jackson’s staff. The result was a shorter document that actually gave her no more rights than the original piece of paper.

I’ve seen the releases, dated Feb. 19, 2003, and I can tell you they will be put into evidence when the State of California v. Michael Joseph Jackson goes to trial on Jan. 31, 2005. They will be just four of many other pieces of paper the Jackson defense is waiting to spring on Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon.


Ironically, on the witness stand recently during pre-trial hearings, the mother’s then-fiancé, U.S. Army Major Jay Jackson, conceded that he’d asked the video producers what they were going “to do for this little family.” But I’m told that he became so bored during the actual video shoot that he left, and the mother — wanting to put her kids in the video with an eye toward making them famous — took over.

Part of the indictment against Jackson includes a charge of conspiracy as well, founded on grand jury testimony from the mother that she was held against her will by Jackson’s employees. At one point, she claimed that Jackson was sending her and her family to Brazil to get rid of them.

But I’ve also seen paperwork indicating the mother was so happy to go on the Brazil vacation that she made the Jackson team buy her a new set of luggage. “She wanted red Kiplinger suitcases,” a source told me yesterday. “She gave a description of what she wanted and she got them.”

The mother also ran up bills for her own shopping and for manicures and pedicures — “hardly something someone gets when they’re kidnapped,” an insider said with a chuckle. The bills are currently in the hands of the prosecutor’s office as the result of raids on Jackson papers last winter and spring.

Meantime, a certain bad mix of egos may be causing trouble on Jackson’s legal team. I’ve heard that lead criminal defense attorney Thomas Mesereau is not getting along with longtime Jackson criminal attorney Steve Cochran. The result could be the departure of Mesereau before Jackson’s trial begins. Who could replace him? I’ve said it since the day this case first materialized last November: Miami’s Roy Black is the answer for Jackson.

La madre diced essere stata costretta a girare il video.
Ma firmò delle carte che ora nn le danno nessun potere.
Inoltre, per qnt riguarda la prigionia, il suo atteggiamento nn era esattamente quello di una persona "in trappola", infatti la prima cosa che fece fu farsi comprare un set d valigie dallo staff di MJ.
Inoltre ( e qui sono ci) pare che Masereau e Cochran siano alla frutta, e che Masereau potrebbe lasciare il caso ancor prima che il processo inizi a Gennaio.
LA risposta di Michael potrebbe essere e Miami, nella persona di Roy Black.

[Non può andare via Masereau! é troppo in gamba![SM=x47925] ]

[Modificato da mikeWeLoVeYoU 24/09/2004 9.59]

cioe' che vorebbe dire che Michael non se la passa o passera' liscia? o che gli avvocati si sono rotti? che significa tutto questo? boh...?? quacuno puo' darmi una spiegazione piu' logica per favore? eppoi MIchael dove alloggaia in questo periodo? ha una sua casa personale? o e' diventato un nomade? [SM=x47955]

Si potrebbero unire le 2 discussioni simili...

magai sembrao sl parole...ma co tutti i soldi ke ha mike vi pare ke nn trova un avvocato alla sua portata!poi può darsi ke siano voci...a me il suo avvocatp piace parekkio...è in gamba...magari è solo una voce..
x quanto riguarda quella "maledetta cozza"...nn ha cmq nessun potere sul video e il resto xkè cmq c'è la sua firma su quelle carte!!